Understanding VISA VAMP: Core Rules, Merchant Impact, and Mitigation Strategies

‍

In response to the evolving landscape of electronic payments and growing concerns over fraud and disputes, Visa has introduced the Visa Acquirer Monitoring Program (VAMP). This new initiative consolidates and replaces the existing Visa Dispute Monitoring Program (VDMP) and Visa Fraud Monitoring Program (VFMP), providing a more streamlined approach to risk management. This article explores the core rules of VAMP, its key metrics, and the potential implications for merchants, along with practical measures to mitigate its impact.

Core Rules and Calculation Formula

What Is the VAMP Ratio?

At the heart of the VAMP program is the VAMP ratio, calculated as follows:

VAMP Ratio = (Reported Fraudulent Transactions + Non-Fraud Disputes) ÷ Total Settled Transactions

• Reported Fraudulent Transactions: This figure is derived from issuer-reported TC40 data, which serves as an early fraud warning.
• Non-Fraud Disputes: This includes transactions associated with dispute reason codes 11, 12, and 13. However, transactions that have been resolved via Order Insight, Rapid Dispute Resolution (RDR), Verifi CDRN alerts, or through conclusive evidence (CE3.0) are excluded.
• Total Settled Transactions: This count is restricted to Card-Not-Present (CNP) transactions only.

This comprehensive approach ensures that the VAMP ratio accurately reflects both fraud and dispute trends in non-face-to-face transactions.

Threshold Settings

Visa has established specific thresholds that come into effect on different dates, aimed at gauging risk levels:

• Effective April 1, 2025:
  • Acquirer Threshold: None
  • Merchant "Elevated" Threshold: 0.5%
  • Merchant "Excessive" Threshold: 1.5%
  • Enumeration Threshold: 20%
• Effective January 1, 2026:
  • Acquirer Threshold: 0.3%
  • Merchant "Elevated" Threshold: 0.5%
  • Merchant "Excessive" Threshold: 0.9%
  • Enumeration Threshold: 20%

Merchants exceeding these thresholds will benefit from a three-month grace period to adjust their practices without incurring penalties. However, failure to meet compliance after the grace period will result in fines on each disputed transaction that remains above the threshold.

Impact on Merchants

Financial Implications

One of the primary concerns for merchants is the potential financial burden. If a merchant fails to lower its VAMP ratio within the grace period, every transaction that breaches the set threshold may incur fines, directly impacting profitability—especially for businesses operating on thin margins or high transaction volumes.

Operational Pressure

Under the VAMP program, merchants are required to intensify their monitoring and management of transaction data. The need for continuous oversight and timely dispute resolution can lead to increased operational complexity and additional costs related to technology upgrades, staff training, and system maintenance.

Reputational Risk

Sustained high rates of fraudulent or disputed transactions can also tarnish a merchant's reputation. Beyond financial penalties, poor performance under the VAMP framework might affect a merchant’s relationship with Visa and other financial partners, potentially leading to broader reputational and competitive disadvantages.

Mitigation Strategies for Merchants

To navigate the challenges posed by VAMP, merchants can adopt several proactive strategies:

Strengthening Fraud Prevention

• Leverage Advanced Technologies: Implement artificial intelligence and machine learning tools to develop robust fraud detection systems that can analyze transactions in real time and identify suspicious patterns.
• Multi-Layered Authentication: Enhance customer verification through multi-factor authentication, device fingerprinting, and behavioral analytics to minimize fraudulent activity.

Optimizing Dispute Management

• Rapid Response Mechanisms: Establish efficient dispute resolution processes using tools like RDR and CDRN to resolve issues swiftly, thereby reducing the number of disputes that count towards the VAMP ratio.
• Continuous Data Monitoring: Regularly review transaction data and dispute trends to identify potential issues early. This proactive approach enables timely adjustments to operational strategies and risk management practices.

Enhancing Internal Controls and Training

• Employee Training: Regularly train staff on the latest fraud prevention techniques and dispute resolution procedures to ensure a unified approach across the organization.
• Early Warning Systems: Develop internal monitoring and alert systems that can flag rising risk indicators, allowing for swift intervention before issues escalate.

‍

‍